Advice
The Leadership Skills Most Managers Never Learn: Why Your Team Keeps Cracking Under Pressure
Related Reading:
Here's something that'll ruffle a few feathers: most managers are absolutely terrible at handling staff during crises. Not incompetent. Not undertrained. Terrible.
I've been consulting with businesses across Australia for nearly two decades now, and I can count on one hand the number of leaders I've met who genuinely know how to support their teams when the pressure's on. The rest? They're winging it, hoping their MBA buzzwords will somehow magic away the chaos.
The Great Australian Management Myth
We love to think we're different here in Australia. More relaxed. Better work-life balance. "She'll be right, mate" culture and all that.
Absolute rubbish.
I've worked with mining companies in Perth where foremen were having panic attacks in portable offices. Retail chains in Melbourne where store managers were crying in stockrooms. Tech startups in Sydney where team leaders were popping anxiety medication like Tic Tacs. The supposed Aussie resilience? It's a marketing campaign, not reality.
The truth is, when crisis hits - whether it's a massive client complaint, a safety incident, redundancies, or just the everyday pressure of impossible deadlines - most managers do exactly the wrong thing. They either go into full drill sergeant mode or they disappear entirely.
What Actually Happens When Stress Hits
Picture this scenario. It's 3 PM on a Thursday. Your biggest client just called to say they're pulling their contract. Worth about $400K annually. The sales team is in shock. Customer service is fielding angry calls. Accounts are panicking about cash flow.
What does your average manager do?
Option A: Storm around the office demanding answers, creating even more anxiety. Option B: Shut their office door and "let people process" while they figure out damage control. Option C: Call an all-hands meeting to "address concerns" with a generic pep talk about "getting through this together."
All wrong. Every single one.
Here's what actually works, and why 73% of managers get it backwards: you need to become simultaneously more present and more specific. Not less. Not generic. More.
The Specificity Rule
When people are stressed, their brains literally can't process vague instructions. "We need to handle this situation" becomes meaningless noise. "Sarah, I need you to call the three backup suppliers on your desk by 5 PM and get quotes" becomes actionable.
I learned this the hard way managing a team during the 2008 financial crisis. Spent weeks giving inspirational speeches about "riding out the storm" while my best people were updating their CVs. Wasn't until I started assigning specific, immediate tasks that things stabilised.
The irony? Most leadership training teaches exactly the opposite. "Trust your team," they say. "Don't micromanage during stress."
Complete nonsense during a crisis.
The Presence Paradox
Here's where it gets interesting. You need to be more visible, not less, but also more strategically absent. Confusing? Let me explain.
When stress hits, you should be physically present more often - walking the floor, checking in, being seen. But you should be mentally absent from the emotional chaos. Your job isn't to absorb everyone's anxiety. It's to be the calm eye in their hurricane.
I once worked with a construction company director in Brisbane who had this nailed. Site accident happened, workers were shaken, safety inspectors were circling. Instead of joining the panic or hiding in his office, he spent the entire day on-site, calmly addressing specific concerns while completely ignoring the emotional temperature around him.
His team later said it was the most reassuring thing anyone could have done. Not because he was emotional support. Because he was unflappable competence.
The Communication Trap Most Leaders Fall Into
Everyone thinks crisis communication means more meetings. More emails. More "touching base."
Wrong again.
Crisis communication means fewer words, more frequently. Think text messages, not essays. Quick check-ins, not lengthy discussions. Specific updates, not comprehensive briefings.
I've seen managers schedule 90-minute "crisis management meetings" while their staff were drowning in actual work. The meeting about the crisis became worse than the crisis itself.
Why Australian Workplaces Are Particularly Vulnerable
Our cultural emphasis on "mateship" and informal hierarchies actually makes us worse at crisis management, not better. When everyone's supposed to be equal, nobody wants to step up and make hard decisions. When everything's supposed to be collaborative, decisive action feels authoritarian.
I've watched entire departments paralysed because the manager was too worried about seeming "un-Australian" to give direct orders during an emergency.
Sometimes leadership isn't democratic. Sometimes it's benevolent dictatorship. And that's exactly what stressed teams need - someone willing to make decisions so they don't have to.
The Skills They Don't Teach in Management Training
Real crisis leadership isn't about motivation or inspiration. It's about logistics and psychology. Specifically:
Resource Allocation Under Pressure - knowing instantly who gets pulled off what to handle the immediate problem. Most managers waste precious hours "assessing the situation" while things get worse.
Emotional Triage - identifying which team members need hands-on support versus which ones need space. Some people work better with constant check-ins during stress. Others need to be left alone to process. Getting this wrong creates more problems.
Information Flow Management - controlling what information reaches which people when. Not everything needs to be shared with everyone immediately. Strategic information filtering reduces panic.
Recovery Planning - thinking about post-crisis team dynamics while still managing the crisis. How will relationships change? Who might need different responsibilities? What processes need updating?
None of this gets covered in your typical leadership workshop. They're too busy teaching you about "authentic communication" and "emotional intelligence." All useful in normal times. Completely inadequate when things go sideways.
The Uncomfortable Truth About Team Resilience
Here's the bit that'll really annoy the HR consultants: some people aren't cut out for high-stress environments, and pretending otherwise helps nobody.
I've seen too many managers burn themselves out trying to coach inherently stress-averse employees through repeated crises. Sometimes the kindest thing you can do is help someone find a role that better suits their temperament.
That doesn't make them weak or less valuable. It makes them human. And recognising human limitations is actually better leadership than pretending everyone can handle anything with enough support.
What Actually Works: The Three-Phase Approach
Phase 1: Immediate Stabilisation (First 4 hours) Direct, specific task assignment. Physical presence. Minimal discussion. Maximum action.
Phase 2: Controlled Information Sharing (Days 1-3) Regular, brief updates. Individual check-ins with key players. Strategic optimism based on actual progress.
Phase 3: Process Recovery (Week 1+) Team debriefs. Process improvements. Individual development conversations. Celebration of what worked.
Most managers skip Phase 1 entirely, rush through Phase 2, and spend months on Phase 3. Getting the timing wrong creates more trauma than the original crisis.
The Perth Mining Example
Worked with a mining operation outside Perth where a piece of equipment failed during their busiest period. Production stopped. Deadlines threatened. Everyone panicking.
The operations manager's response? Immediately assigned specific people to specific backup tasks. No discussions. No consultations. Just clear directions based on existing emergency protocols. Within two hours, they had alternative solutions running.
Then - and only then - did he call the team together to explain the situation and get input on longer-term solutions.
Crisis managed. Team intact. Production resumed.
The key? He separated immediate action from collaborative planning. Most managers try to do both simultaneously and end up doing neither effectively.
Final Thoughts: Leadership Isn't Always Pretty
Managing staff through stress isn't about being liked. It's not about being fair. It's not about being considerate of everyone's feelings.
It's about being effective when effectiveness matters most.
The managers who succeed during crises are often the ones who seem least "people-focused" in normal times. They understand systems. They think logically under pressure. They're comfortable making unpopular decisions quickly.
Controversial? Absolutely. But I'd rather work for someone who keeps the ship afloat during storms than someone who holds beautiful meetings while it sinks.
That's the difference between management theory and management reality. And frankly, most workplaces could use more of the latter.
Additional Resources: